International Maritime Associates, Inc. | home
May 2011 Oil and Gas Journal | February 2009 Oil and Gas Journal | March 26 2008 Business Times | May 2006 Maritime Technology Reporter | August 2003 Maritime Reporter | June 11, 2001 Oil and Gas Journal | June 2001 Maritime Reporter | May 1998 Offshore Magazine
Impact of Ports
on the Ability to
James R. McCaul
<![if !supportLists]>1. <![endif]>Seaports are gateways in global distribution networks. Their function is to service importers and exporters. To the extent a port is efficient and movement though the port is seamless and predictable, the cost of imported products is lowered and exporters using the port are better able to compete in international markets. To the extent there are inefficiencies, unpredictability and extra costs, consumers pay more for imported products and exporters are handicapped in their ability to compete internationally. Sounds obvious but we have seen many situations where the connection between trade access and port costs is either not recognized or appreciated. All of the supply chain participants upstream and downstream of the port lose when this happens. We discuss in this paper some of the more common inefficiencies and added costs in ports that impact the ability of a country to access international markets, describe actions that can be taken and indicate why these actions are important.
<![if !supportLists]>A. <![endif]>Common Problems in Ports
<![if !supportLists]>2. <![endif]>We have encountered ten problems in the port sector that impact a country's ability to access international markets. Not all these problems exist in all ports. But they are frequently found and their cumulative impact can be a substantial burden on exporters and importers.
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Using ports as cash cows for the general treasury
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Failing to keep pace with trade requirements
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Investing in the wrong facilities and equipment
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Using port employment for social purposes
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Burdensome clearance and inspection practices
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Sticky labor
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Failure to apply IT strategically
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Poorly structured privatization of port services
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Policies and regulations inhibiting competition
<![if !supportLists]>· <![endif]>Bribery and corruption in the ports
Each of these is discussed below, along with examples of situations where we have seen the problem firsthand, some where corrective actions have been taken.
<![if !supportLists]>3. <![endif]>Using Ports as Cash Cows Ports that service the local economy should be lean operations. They should raise sufficient revenue to (1) cover operating expenses (2) provide for reinvestment in facilities and (3) generate a small accumulation for unexpected events. To the extent the tariff is set up to generate a surplus beyond this amount, a tax is being imposed on exporters and importers. But situations are often encountered where a government treats its ports as cash cows to generate income for the general treasury. In one country we have worked, the port authority receives 51 to 65 percent of the revenue generated by the terminal operators operating in the port. Even higher revenue sharing percentages apply to some of the other port services. What makes this particularly notable is that virtually all of the traffic moving through the port is locally generated. So in effect, the surplus generated by the port sector is nothing more than a tax on local exporters and importers. This tax ultimately gets passed on to local consumers in the form of higher prices for imported consumer goods. It also raises the cost of the country's exports, impeding the ability of exporters to compete in world markets. What would happen to prices of imported goods in local supermarkets if the port authority decreased its take from the revenue sharing arrangements? How much more competitive would exporters be? These are the questions that should be asked.
<![endif]>Failing to Keep
Pace with Trade Requirements To ensure efficient access to international
markets, ports need to keep pace with underlying customer requirements. Sometimes things are beyond the control of
the port. Location, natural harbor
conditions, original quay depth design, etc. can present major obstacles to
being able to keep pace with requirements to accept increasingly larger containerships.
This in turn can take a port off the
mainline route, potentially impacting the country's importers and exporters
through longer transit time and higher transport costs. For example, most ports in the
<![endif]>Investing in the
wrong facilities or equipment The flip side to not investing enough is to
buy the wrong thing. This happens all
too frequently in the port sector, resulting in the need to recapture
expenditures for useless capital equipment through increased charges or deferring
investment in other port services. Examples
include purchasing new container cranes with inadequate height or reach for the
types of ships that will use the port, requiring additional expenditure for
modification and never quite getting the full efficiency that would have been
achieved if the proper size cranes had been initially ordered. This could also include a massive blooper
such as investing in a new container terminal that goes largely unused because
the market either didn't exist or evaporated before construction ended. The terminal in
Employment for Social Purposes This is a problem common to many ports. Basically, the port sector is often used to
provide employment to persons who otherwise would be out of work. It's relatively easy to do this when the
ports are operated as public entities under the control of a government
ministry. Just create some new
employment positions and pass along the added cost of the excess labor force
through higher charges to port users. In
Clearance and Inspection Practices While the ultimate objective should be
for ports to provide seamless movement of cargo, in some cases the process is
unbelievably inefficient and slow due to burdensome clearance and inspection
procedures. In one country in which we
have worked, rules call for virtually all imported containers to be stripped
and inspected in the port area. Seeing a
large number of containers lined up row after row with the contents pulled out
for inspection is an impressive sight. In another country, clearance procedures require
as much as 15 to 20 days from arrival in the port and the resulting congestion
in the port adds 0.5 percent in demurrage charges to the cost of imported
goods. A Bank report in the late 1990s
estimated that this was costing the country more than $60 million per year. In a third country, we found that as many as
17 signatures are needed for importing goods and as long as one month can pass
before import cargo is cleared. To the
extent these problems remain, it is not possible for importers and exporters to
take full advantage of containerized transport.
Instead of seamless movement of goods, the clearance requirements result
in a series of barriers that impede traffic flow. These burdens can be largely eliminated. For example, in the new Sukhna port in
Ocean shipping has changed significantly over the past 30 years with the
introduction of containerization. Use of
containers has resulted in a dramatic decrease in the number of personnel
required to handle cargo in the ports, as well as major changes in the types of
skills required. But the ability to make
these adjustments has been limited by "sticky" labor practices in ports
throughout the world. Many of these
practices are the result of historic arrangements that are very difficult to
<![endif]>Failure to Apply IT
Strategically Physical distribution is increasingly information intensive
and ports are often not keeping pace with the requirements of international
traders. With the intensification of IT
in global logistics, ports are expected to be information agents sources of
data entry, quality control and confirmation of existing data, integrators of
diverse data, synthesizers of data into operationally relevant information. Their role is becoming more and more
important to assuring that the supply chain operations of commercial partners
upstream and downstream of the port remain integrated, coordinated and
transparent. Much of the success of
<![if !supportLists]>10. <![endif]>Poorly Structured Privatization of Port Services Generally speaking, privatization of port services has been found to improve the efficiency of port operations. The advantages from port privatization are well documented in the Port Toolkit. But a poorly structured privatization can decrease rather than increase the efficiency of port operations. A worse case privatization scenario is the transfer of port services from a public to a private monopoly without providing a regulatory structure to ensure the public interest is maintained. We recently encountered a situation where management of a port has been outsourced to an international port operator who has been given full control over the operations and finances of the port for the next twenty years. But no entity has been established to monitor the practices of the port operator despite the fact that the port is the only gateway to the country. What's to ensure the public interest is protected? We also recently encountered a situation where the criteria for selecting the successful bidder for a terminal concession were poorly structured, resulting in the award to the bidder who used a loophole to win the contract. Ok, except the bidder then discovered that he couldn't make money with the price he offered and ultimately backed out of the deal leaving the government with a semi-finished container terminal in which it had invested over $100 million. The terminal remains unfinished today. How much has the delay in opening the terminal had on the ability of local exporters and importers to access markets?
<![if !supportLists]>11. <![endif]> Policies and Regulations Inhibiting Competition There are many ways that competition can be inhibited in the port sector. Any of these will ultimately raise the cost of using the port. An example found in many countries is the use of a national tariff that applies common charges to all of the country's ports. This is frequently the situation where the ports are under the control of a central government ministry. In one country in which we have worked, a national tariff applies to the eight ports in the country, preventing ports from competing with one another for traffic on the basis of different prices. This "one size fits all" tariff policy removes one of the basic freedoms for competition. We found, for example, that establishing separate tariffs for each port would open the opportunity for one particularly underutilized port to compete for containers originating in the local industrial area, rather than be sent 150 miles by road to another port for export as is now done. Each port has its own cost structure and should be permitted to exploit its comparative advantages. Within ports there should also be the opportunity for competition among port service providers. Regulations often restrict the number of service providers in particular activities, ostensibly to provide sufficient core business for current players and maintain the quality of service in the port. But in many situations, there is nothing wrong with opening the sector to anyone who wants to play. The recent freeing up of tug service in European ports has indicated the advantages that can be gained from offering competition to the established player. In the end, competition should increase efficiency and reduce the cost of port services. Ultimately the port user wins and access to international markets is enhanced.
<![if !supportLists]>12. <![endif]>Bribery and Corruption in the Ports
Let's face it, the port business is not comprised of angels. Stories exist throughout the world of small
time bribery that has to accompany passage of ships and cargo through a
port. Opportunities for rent collection
abound wherever traffic queues form, vessels line up for discharge or cargoes
accumulate in the port. And once rent collection becomes institutionalized
within a port, opportunities to reduce delays and to shorten queues invariably
fail. This is not to say ports are
unique. Bribery is common practice in
many activities. But anecdotally, the
port sector seems to have more than its fair share of this practice. Any ship's agent, freight forwarder or other
company responsible for moving ships or cargo through a port knows there are
many hands to grease. While many of
these euphemistically named "informal costs" or "rent" are individually minor
amounts, overall they can add up to a substantial figure and be a general
burden on the port user. In
<![if !supportLists]>B. <![endif]>What Can Be Done
<![if !supportLists]>13. <![endif]>While these problems are formidable, they are not unsolvable. But the solution must start by recognizing that there is a problem and harnessing top level support to deal with a very complex situation involving many players. Then a long term strategy should be formulated, measurable goals set and continued monitoring set in place to assure things are moving in the right direction. Some ideas on what can be done are discussed below.
<![if !supportLists]>14. <![endif]>Recognize There are Problems The first step is to recognize that problems exist in a country's port sector. This is not so easy. Port managers have a perspective that often precludes seeing problems that the port can be having on the overall economy. We have frequently encountered situations where a port authority is quite proud of its financial performance, pointing to the sizable surplus that the port generated in the latest year. But management fails to point out that the rates charged for services in the port are higher than ports in the surrounding area, productivity is not so good and the port user community is dissatisfied with the level of service it is receiving. All the port manager sees is that the port makes money. Of course it makes money without financial checks from competition a port is largely able to make a surplus by simply adjusting the prices to cover costs and make a surplus. If costs increase, rates increase. Underlying problems can go a long time before being noticed. In almost every other key link in international supply chains comparisons are made being made, traded and compared among production and distribution platforms. This process of continuous process analysis and refinement known generically as "benchmarking" has become a refined science within most globally competitive industries. Sadly, this is not yet the case in the port industry.
<![if !supportLists]>15. <![endif]>Harness Top Level Support to Deal with the Problems Ports are complicated places. One writer described them as places where the ship hits the paperwork. All types of government agencies can be found in ports that have some degree of control over activities in the port area. Customs is responsible for inspecting cargo and ensuring duties are collected. Agriculture is responsible for checking the quality of imported foods. The Coast Guard controls access to the port and watches for environmental deficiencies. Immigration watches for unwelcome visitors. Other agencies get involved elsewhere. All of these agencies typically report to separate government ministries, with the result that there is frequently lots of finger pointing, rather that solution finding, when port users complain about problems in the port. We recently studied a port in the middle east that had a reputation for poor, unfriendly service. Our recommendation to make certain changes in Customs inspection procedures to reduce clearance time provoked a loud protest from Customs, saying port employees, not Customs inspectors were the source of the problem. The port was not transferring containers to the inspection area in a timely manner. Port management had a different view, saying it was all the fault of Customs. They were taking too long to inspect. It is not uncommon to see this type of finger pointing which in the end is not productive as it does not solve the problem. The only way to effectively deal with issues that cross ministerial borders is by creating an inter-ministerial coordinating group that has full powers to identify and resolve issues that cause port inefficiency. But this group needs top level support in the government to be effective and should include participation of the most senior government economic advisor. We believe such a coordinating body, provided it has the full support at the top of the government, can get at the problems in the ports and make a difference.
<![if !supportLists]>16. <![endif]>Formulate Strategy and Priorities for the Port Sector The strategy of a port should be to maximize its contribution to the country's ability to access international markets. Investments in equipment and facilities should be benchmarked against this strategy and only investments that contribute to the strategic vision should be undertaken, and even there priorities are required to determine which investments get first access to available funds. In formulating strategy and priorities, we have found a mapping technique placing the port on a competitive landscape to be useful. However, the main point is not the technique, rather the type of thinking that needs to go into a strategic decision to invest in new facilities. The test of any investment should be to what extent it will ultimately improve access to international markets.
<![if !supportLists]>17. <![endif]>Establish Measurable Goals for Improving Market Access A strategy without measurable goals will likely die on the vine. There will be no way to know whether the implementation of the strategy is successful. Measurable goals such as reducing port costs as a percent of CIF value of imported goods, reducing average clearance time and reducing paperwork required for export and import shipments are direct indications of how successful the strategy is in improving market access. Specific, but realistic, targets should be set for these improvements. Note that among these goals is no mention of reducing labor, privatizing, buying new equipment, etc. These are means, not ends.
<![if !supportLists]>18. <![endif]>Follow up with Continued Oversight at the Top Level Someone at a high level should be responsible for reviewing the performance of the port sector on a continuing basis and ensuring that the strategic goals are being achieved. If not, responsibility for the shortfall should be determined and corrective actions taken. This may include replacement of top management in the port. The entire focus should be on making the port sector responsive to accessing the international market. No barrier to trade created by the port sector should be accepted.
<![if !supportLists]>C. <![endif]>Why Action is Needed
<![if !supportLists]>19. <![endif]>Ports should contribute to a country's ability to access international markets. They should be integral partners in a global distribution network, not inhibitors to trade. To the extent the country's port sector falls short of fulfilling this goal, exporters are less competitive, consumers pay more for imported goods, the country does not exploit the advantages of modern transport systems and the country's economic growth potential is not realized. Let's look at each in more detail.
<![if !supportLists]>20. <![endif]>Exports are Less Competitive Exporters operate on a global competitive
landscape where customers often have the capability to switch sources of supply. Many types of fruits, for example, can be
<![if !supportLists]>21. <![endif]>Consumers Pay More for Imported Goods
Higher port costs are passed on to port users, ultimately passing through to
consumers of imported products. This can
be a major factor driving the cost of basic commodities in developing
countries. In the Horn of Africa, for
example, a USAID study found that port related costs for delivery of basic
<![if !supportLists]>22. <![endif]>Advantages of Modern Transport are not
Exploited Port inefficiency prevents a country from fully benefiting from
the advantages of containerized shipping.
Containerization offers the potential to seamlessly move goods from
point of origin to final destination under one waybill without the cargo being
disturbed in route. Ports that create
impediments to seamless transport are doing a major disservice to the country's
economy. For example, a country in which
we have worked in the middle east requires incoming reefer containers to be
emptied at the port and the contents transferred to local trucks for inland
movement. This interrupts the flow of
traffic, adding cost and burdens that get passed on to consumers. In
<![if !supportLists]>23. <![endif]>Economic Growth Stagnates Reduced export opportunities, higher import costs, not exploiting modern transport processes is a combination that limits economic growth. The extent of the impact will depend on the circumstances of specific countries. The greater the reliance on international markets, the more the impact. But overall the world economy is increasingly being integrated and the export share of GDP in most countries has been increasing over the past 50 years. Failing to keep pace with world trade growth will leave a country behind in this international competition. Ports have the capability to help countries stay in front of the competition, or fall behind.
<![if !supportLists]>D. <![endif]>To Sum Up
<![if !supportLists]>24. <![endif]>Ports are nodes in international distribution networks that affect the efficiency, predictability and cost of these networks and impact access to international markets. We have described a variety of problems typically found in ports. Eliminating these problems should be a high priority. The results of an inefficient, high cost port will ripple through the economy, cutting exporters from potential overseas markets and raising prices consumers pay for imported goods. We think many of the problems are solvable, but first they must be recognized and top level action taken to address them.